Einstein discovered a revolutionary formula E=mc². Using the formula, atom bomb was made. We get two principles from the formula. One is we get energy from the destruction of an atom. Another is we can get back an atom from only energy. In my consideration first principle is correct. That’s why atom bomb could be made. Second principle is not correct. That’s why we can’t make nuclear blankets till now. Nuclear blanket is such a matter which we can use as an energy deficit object/weapon which will capture the energy, released by an atom bomb from a collision. Really can we make an atom only from energy? How come energy knows what kind of atom we are going to construct? Is that the atom of Uranium or Carbon or other? Every atom has an identity which differentiates it from others. Say, Uranium has 192 numbers of protons whereas a Carbon bears only 6 protons. According to mechanics for new age, every atom bears a critical mass that we can’t create or destroy and that’s the identity of an object and that mass we can’t convert into energy. So, to create an atom from energy we require to adjoin the critical mass of the atom first which we want to built.
Einstein was influenced by the revolutionary idea given by Newton that moving object moves with uniform velocity or a static object remain at rest forever until an external force changes its state. Both Newton & Einstein can’t identify by their laws & formulas whether an object is in rest or is moving. Einstein fails to identity which train is moving and he concludes movement is a relative matter. Sitting in a train you identify that other train is moving though other train might be in rest and yours is moving. According to mechanics for new age, applied force determines an object is moving or not and no object moves without any operating force and applied force act as an operating force. So, very easily we can identify the object in rest or moving. Einstein got puzzled observing the same incident from inside the train and outside train where a man is playing a ping pong ball inside the train and where he totally confused how far the ball travels. Einstein concludes that the distance is relative. the velocity of an object and the quantity of an object determines the According to mechanics for new age, value of applied force determines traveling distance of an object. So, how far a ping pong ball moves vertically and horizontally is determined by the applied force on it and the applied force on the train.
Einstein does not get any absolute standard of space and time. He imagines that what we compute here in earth one meter or one second. in mars aliens might not compute the same. Einstein concludes, every object is in motion and there is no absolute landmark by which we can specify the location of other objects. We have only relative locations by the perspective of an observer. He finalizes, the speed of light would only be the absolute thing by which we can measure time and distance absolutely. According to mechanics for new age, the speed of light is a ratio (s:t) by which we can’t measure time & distance accurately. Because by the speed of light if you increase time, distance would also be increased. There are so many cases where time increases for a shorter distance. Moreover, by this process you require to measure the time & distance with some measuring tools also. We do not see the light ray; we depend on seeing the object. We have a reservation on the process of seeing an object through light ray. So, the speed of light, a constant ratio can’t be the absolute measuring tool for time & space. Think, if all the planets and stars move with a same velocity then why not we are able to standardize time & distance or the measuring tools for all.
Einstein introduces some new concepts like time dilation, time machine etc. He invented the concepts when he was sixteen years old young boy. But his concepts seem to me very immature. He imagines a light ray and an object travels from one place to another at a same time. He describes the phenomena is observed by a moving observer. He also thinks if the phenomena is observed by a static observer, he will measure the light ray is taking some less time than that of before. Einstein finds and decides a time dilation is there. In my consideration this is nothing but an illusion. In case of moving observer light ray follow curve path and in case of static observer object follows straight path. This is the magic of Einstein and his relativity mechanics.
Einstein’s theory is successful to construct a time machine whereas till now we couldn’t make any time machine practically. One problem is identified that no object travels beyond the speed of light. If it is possible then the object will make a loop as like as a train enters into a station from the back of which it has just passes through or left, an informer discloses the result of an Olympic games before it starts. According to mechanics for new age, time is a measure of the chronological advancement of the age of universe which doesn’t relate with anything like light ray or watch etc. Here you can’t go back in time. Because object moves with any velocity, it takes some time, which means the age of universe increases.
Einstein introduced so many new concepts like simultaneity, length contraction, twin paradox etc. These all are treated in mechanics for new age as the limitations of the hypothesis given by Einstein. Obviously Einstein made the science very complex intentionally with grave sin, which doesn’t match with natural phenomena. Mechanics for new age endeavors to find out the problems with the theory given by Einstein and to reshuffle it and to make it understandable for all.