When I was reading the book of St Hawking, “A Brief History of Time was seem to me that I was gradually sinking under a deep sea. It wa also seem to me that for him it is possible to create one more univer in a local laboratory. He was taken a task to describe the creation universe from A to Z by science even though the explanation does make any similarity with the real one. The explanation is very clum D far from natural phenomena and finally with no logical conclusion That’s why nobody is getting interest on science and the scienti explanation of the creation of universe.
zero. According to mechanics for new age, universe is created in vacuum. It is expected to explain the creation of universe would be started from Everything like time, space, energy, applied forces etc started their
journey from zero. From zero they are extended in a position like today. All the elementary particles except neutron were created at a first instant. Then all the skeletons of all atoms and objects were formed. A huge nuclear force was applied to separate all objects from their centers. Due to the application of nuclear forces universe expanded and when the objects were saturated by energy, expansion halted forever. Skeleton
of all plants, trees and animals were created. Souls were incorporated. That’s how universe was created. Universe didn’t formed automatically or from only energy or from empty space. Black hole, multi-verse, anti-universe, anti-particles are no way related or necessary to explain universe.
We ought to rethink about the prevailing co-ordinate system where negative integers are there and create confusions in calculation. Negative integers like negative mass, negative applied force, negative acceleration, negative energy, negative curvature this all will be removed by the mechanics for new age.
We admit divine intervention. We can’t deny divine intervention. If elementary particles were created as a first instance we can’t deny, we can’t describe elementary particles are created from energy and energy from empty space. We need to separate the divine intervention from science. We can’t describe everything by science, as it bears a specific limit which we can’t come across. We can’t go outside universe to inquire what is going on there. This is not the part of science. So, describing the creation of universe remaining within the limit in space of science will be the best description of science forever.